Attorney Mike Lyon obtained a complete defense verdict on behalf of the firm’s client, a cardiologist who had been involved in a severe automobile accident on the Northeast Extension of the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Montgomery County.
Our client had been involved a two-car accident in which he accidentally lost control of his vehicle due to weather conditions and the roadway, and crashed into a concrete barrier on the side of the highway. Although he was able to move his car to the side, he was unable to move it completely off the road as there was no shoulder available due to construction activity. While sitting in the car and awaiting emergency help, the client was struck in the front end by an oncoming vehicle that had hydroplaned and could not be stopped. The driver of that vehicle brought a lawsuit against our client for negligence.
During a two-day trial, Mike established during the trial that the accident was not the result of carelessness or negligence on behalf of our client, and cross examined the plaintiff and his expert in arguing that the accident was the plaintiff’s fault. Following twenty minutes of deliberation, the jury of five women and seven men returned a unanimous verdict in favor of our client, finding that he had not acted negligently.
Bruce Pancio achieved a terrific result for our client, a driver who accidentally caused a motor vehicle accident, in a two-day jury trial in Montgomery County. Our client had admitted negligence prior to trial, and the only issue left for the jury’s consideration was the extent of the plaintiff’s damages. During trial, the plaintiff argued to the jury that his injuries were certain to be permanent and would cause long-lasting effects on his life. Through effective cross-examination and use of expert testimony, Bruce convinced the jury that the plaintiff’s injuries were unlikely to be permanent and were limited in time and duration. The jury awarded the plaintiff an amount directly in line with Bruce’s presentation, and far short of the total amount the plaintiff had demanded before trial and even further short of the amount he requested the jury award.
Following a full-day arbitration in Montgomery County, Chelsea Dearden obtained a complete verdict in favor of her client in a case where the plaintiff alleged serious and permanent injuries following a motor vehicle accident. Through her own testimony and medical records, the plaintiff alleged that she was forced to miss substantial time from work and continued to suffer agonizing and constant pain throughout her lower back and neck as a result of the accident. Chelsea, whose client admitted to negligence and factually causing the accident to occur, effectively cross-examined the plaintiff and confronted her with multiple inconsistencies in her records and presentation to show that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious impairment of bodily function in the accident. The arbitrators then entered a verdict in favor of Chelsea’s client, which the plaintiff chose not to appeal.
Following a multi-day trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, the Honorable Joseph P. Walsh obtained a complete defense verdict on behalf of his clients, homeowners who were hosting a Memorial Day party for their neighbors and friends. The Plaintiff alleged that she had tripped and fallen over a wooden ramp that Joe’s clients had installed after the father of one of his clients had become confined to a wheelchair and needed access to the house. The Plaintiff alleged that she was permanently disabled as a result of the alleged fall. Through cross examination of the Plaintiff, direct examination of his own clients, and expert witness testimony and reports, Joe convinced the twelve person jury that his clients had not acted negligently in the design, implementation, or construction of the ramp. The jury returned a unanimous verdict on behalf of Joe’s clients.
The Honorable Joseph P. Walsh and Jason Edwards obtained summary judgment resulting in the dismissal with prejudice of a breach of contract suit filed in Montgomery County against a local Township. Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim against the Township was based upon allegations that Township supervisors violated a Confidentiality provision in a Separation Agreement between Plaintiff and the Township. Plaintiff sought damages exceeding $50,000. Although both parties filed motions seeking judgment in their favor, Joe and Jason argued that the Plaintiff had failed to establish harm to his reputation and that his alleged damages were speculative. The Court agreed with Joe and Jason’s arguments, and dismissed Plaintiff’s case with prejudice.
Mike Lyon obtained a defense verdict following a jury trial in Montgomery County involving a severe automobile accident in Montgomery Township, PA. The Plaintiff in the case alleged severe and permanent injuries following an accident in which her vehicle was struck from the side by Mike’s client. Mike used Plaintiff’s own medical evidence and admissions during discovery to effectively cross examine the plaintiff during trial, and argued that her injuries did not amount to a serious injury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Mike’s client and found that no serious injury requiring compensation had occurred. The court entered judgment on the verdict, and Mike continues to litigate the matter through post-trial motions.
In case involving a multi-car accident and several parties, Chelsea Dearden obtained a complete defense verdict following arbitration in a case in Bucks County. The plaintiff alleged that he suffered serious and disabling injuries following an accident in 2013 after having been struck in the rear by another vehicle. The driver of the striking vehicle separately alleged that Chelsea’s client then struck his vehicle, and claimed that the second impact caused Plaintiff’s injuries. Through the use of medical records, photographic and documentary evidence, and the parties’ testimony as to the accident, Chelsea convinced the arbitration panel that her client’s actions were not negligent and were not the cause of any injuries suffered by the plaintiff. The arbitrators found that the initial impact was the sole cause of plaintiff’s damages, and entered a verdict in favor of Chelsea’s client, which none of the parties chose to appeal.
Bruce Pancio obtained a complete defense verdict in a premises liability case that involved disputed issues of liability, causation, and damages. The plaintiff alleged that he had been caused to slip and fall due to water that he had alleged ran in front of Bruce’s client’s property and froze over during the winter. Through a multiple day trial, Bruce convinced the jury that his client had not acted in a negligent or improper manner. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Bruce’s client.
Bruce Pancio obtained a favorable jury verdict in an underinsured motorist (UIM) case in Delaware County that involved heavily disputed issues of causation and damages. The plaintiff in the case alleged that she had suffered significant injuries after a motor vehicle accident in 2015. After recovering damages from the third party tortfeasor, the plaintiff sought to recover UIM proceeds from her own insurance policy and demanded for the full UIM policy limits. In defending the case, Bruce used medical records, the plaintiff’s own testimony, and expert evidence and argued that the plaintiff’s injuries were not severe such that the full policy limits available to her should have been awarded. The jury awarded the plaintiff damages significantly below the policy limits of the case and under what she had previously demanded. Bruce continues to litigate the matter on appeal.
The Honorable Joseph P. Walsh obtained a defense verdict after a multi-day trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County. The plaintiff alleged that she sustained serious and permanent personal injuries after falling into a retention basin bordering the defendant’s property. Joe convinced the jury that his clients had not acted in a negligent manner, and that the Plaintiff had trespassed on to his clients’ property prior to being injured. The jury returned a full defense verdict in favor of Joe’s clients, which the plaintiff has not chosen to appeal.
a matter involving disputed issues of fact and law, Mike Lyon obtained a
complete defense decision on behalf of his client, a local business and
landowner. The plaintiff had alleged
serious personal injuries after having fallen on black ice in a parking lot
after having purchased food and coffee in a store on property belonging to
Mike’s client. Mike defended the case
before an arbitration panel in Montgomery County, and argued that his client
had not acted negligently in any fashion and had not caused the plaintiff’s
injuries to occur. The panel returned a
unanimous decision in favor of Mike’s client, which the plaintiff chose not to